1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2087 of 2025 1 - Ranjeet Rajak S/o Chandrashekhar Rajak Aged About 46 Years R/o Ward No. 3 Balrampur, P.S. And Tahsil Balrampur, District Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) 2 - Yenulhuqe Ansari S/o Akbar Miyan Aged About 60 Years R/o Ward No. 3 Balrampur, P.S. And Tahsil Balrampur, District Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) 3 - Mohd. Alamgir Ansari S/o Mohd. Ajbar Ansari Aged About 30 Years R/o Ward No. 3 Balrampur, P.S. And Tahsil Balrampur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue Mahandi Bhawan New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Secretary Department Of Urban Development Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Collector Balrampur District Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) 4 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Balrampur District Balrampur- Ramanujganj (C.G.) 5 - Tahsildar Balrampur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) VISHAKHA BEOHAR Digitally signed by VISHAKHA BEOHAR Date: 2025.04.25 12:29:57 +0530 2 6 - Chief Municipal Officer Nagarpalika Prishad-Balrampur, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner :- Mr. A.N. Pandey, Advocate through video conferencing & Ms. Akancha Vishwakarma, Advocate For State :- Mr. Praveen Das, Dy. A.G. & Mrs. Upasana Mehta, Dy. G.A. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order On Board 25.04.2025 1. It has been vehemently objected by the learned State counsel that this petition is not maintainable as for individual right separate revenue cases have been registered for each of the petitioner, however, without considering the nature of the same, joint petitions have been filed which is not maintainable. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file separate petition raising individual grievances of the concerned petitioners. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh petition, in accordance with law. 4. However, looking to the fact that the order in respect of demolition has been passed by the concerned Tehsildar, as such, only for 3 three days, the concerned authority i.e. the Tehsildar, Balrampur is directed not to demolish the superstructure of the petitioner. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Vishakha