C/M SHIVDAN COLLEGE OF PHARMACY THRU. MANAGER / CHAIRMAN MR.SURYABHAN YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. TECHNICAL EDUCATION LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/10164/2025 · 2025-10-17
S Q H Rizvi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197746 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197746 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10164 of 2025 Court No. - 20 HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J.
1. Heard Sri Satyendra Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners; Sri Dheeraj Ojha, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents No. 1 & 2; and Sri Sumeet Tahil Ramani, Advocate, holding brief on behalf of Sri S. M. Singh Royekwar, learned counsel for the Pharmacy Council of India/respondent No. 3; and Sri D. K. Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4. 2. At the very outset, Sri D. K. Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for the respondent No. 4 has pointed out that in view of the fact that the due affiliation has already been granted to the petition No. 2, the present writ petition has become infructuous in respect of the petitioner No. 2. 3. The aforesaid statement made by the learned counsel for the respondent No. 4 has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Further, he prayed for permission to withdraw the present writ petition in respect of the petitioner No. 1 with the liberty to file a fresh petition to enable the petitioner No. 1 to challenge the order dated 20.09.2025 issued by the Pharmacy Council of India, whereby the institution/petitioner No. 1 has been stopped from taking admission in the first year of the academic session 2025-26. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jay Prakash Singh, Satyendra Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., D. K. Singh Chauhan, S. M. Singh Royekwar C/M Shivdan College Of Pharmacy through its Manager / Chairman Mr. Suryabhan Yadav And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. through Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Technical Education Lucknow And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts that have been brought to the notice by the learned counsel for the respective parties, this Court is of the view that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the present writ petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is consigned to record in respect of the petitioner No. 2. 6. However, the present writ petition is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner No. 1 to file a fresh petition challenging the aforesaid order dated 20.09.2025 issued by the Pharmacy Council of India (respondent No. 3), if so advised.
October 17, 2025 (Manoj K.) WRIC No. 10164 of 2025 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench