SADDAM AHMAD KHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/374/2025 · 2025-11-21
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197735 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197735 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 374 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. No one appears on behalf of the informant despite service of notice.
2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.82 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 109 BNS, P.S. Fardhan, District Kheri.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant was granted the benefit of interim anticipatory bail vide order dated 8.5.2025.
4. As there is no material to suggest that the applicant is not cooperating with the investigation, interim anticipatory bail granted on 8.5.2025 is made final till the submission of police report. November 21, 2025 J. K. Dinkar Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Saddam Ahmad Khan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench