IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition (T) No.5 of 2025 Date of Decision: 18.08.2025 _______________________________________________________ Roshani Devi …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Adarsh K.Vashista & Mr. Shivom Vashista, Advocates. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Vishal Panwar & Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record instructions dated 14.08.2025, issued under the signatures of Director, Elementary Education, Himachal Pradesh, Shimla, enclosing therewith copy of office order dated 14.08.2025 passed in purported compliance of mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, Mr. B.C.Verma, learned Additional Advocate General, states that mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be complied with, stands duly complied with. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2. Having carefully perused instructions as well as documents annexed therewith, this Court finds merit in the contention of Mr. B.C.Verma, learned Additional Advocate General that bare perusal of instructions as well as documents annexed therewith, which are taken on record, reveals that services initially rendered by the petitioner i.e. Smt. Roshani Devi, Retd. Drawing Master, GMS Maman u/s GSS Lad Bharol, District Mandi on special contract basis w.e.f 03.11.2000 followed by her regularization as Drawing Master as ordered by the Dy. Director of Elementary Education, Mandi, District Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, vide office order dated 18.01.2010, on completion of eight years of service as on 31.03.2009 and subsequently, joining as such on regular basis have been counted for the purpose of increments and pensionary benefits subject to final outcome of SLP filed by the respondents, laying challenge to judgment passed this Court in CWPOA No. 5707 of 2019. Necessary directions already stand issued to Principal/Headmaster concerned to count the services of the petitioner rendered on special contract basis w.e.f 03.11.2000 for annual increments as well as pensionary benefits under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972. 3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the same are closed with a direction to the respondents to ensure that consequential benefits, in 3 terms of aforesaid compliance, if not already released, shall be released expeditiously, preferably within three months from today. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge August 18, 2025 (sunil)