PRAMOD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/9123/2025 · 2025-10-08
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197727 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197727 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9123 of 2025
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Supplementary affidavit filed today in Court is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State; Shri Arun Kumar Saxena, learned counsel for respondent no.2 and perused the record. 3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.139 of 2025, under Section 65(1) of BNS & Section 3/4(2) of POCSO Act, P.S. Mishrikh, District Sitapur. 4. The FIR in question was lodged alleging that on 27.05.2025 at about 5 pm, daughter of the informant aged about 14 years had gone out of the agricultural fields when the applicant allegedly caused wrong on her. Subsequently, the medical of the victim was done on the very next date, however, the medical does not corroborate any of the allegations with regard to use of force. The tentative age as per the examination is around 17 years. 5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the fact that the medical was done on the very next date and the same does not corroborate any of the allegations coupled with the fact that against the applicant there was one case of criminal antecedent in which a final report was filed which has been accepted by the trial Court, the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bhanu Pratap Kushwaha, Mohammad Salman Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Pramod .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
applicant who is in custody since 28.05.2025 is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant Pramod be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
October 8, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 9123 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench