HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6484 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Shri Dinesh Kumar Pushpakar, learned counsel for the petitioner states that because of some defects in the petition, he does not want to press the instant petition and he seeks liberty to file a fresh petition. 2. Smt. Seema Dixit, learned Standing counsel for the State of U.P. and Shri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2- Gram Panchayat do not have any objections against the aforesaid request made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. 4. Let the certified copies annexed with the petition be returned to the learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining their photocopies of the same on record. November 10, 2025 Preeti Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Pushpakar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Nand Lal Mali .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Distt. Magistrate Sultanpur And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench