Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19772 (AP)

ADAPUREDDI MARIDESWAERA RAO v. GRANDHI NAGESWARA RAO

CRP/1228/2022 · 2025-07-10

T C D Sekhar

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010276722022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1228/2022 Between: 1. ADAPUREDDI MARIDESWAERA RAO, S/O SURYANARAYANA@ SOURINAIDU, HINDU, AHED 57 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 37-11-218/3/3, FLAT NO. 202, SRI DASANJANEYA SWAMI SADAN, PR GARDEN, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. GRANDHI NAGESWARA RAO, , S/O POTHURAJU, HINDU, AGED 57 YEARS, R/O NARSIPATNAM TOWN, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. DURGA NAGESH, S/O SITA RAMA CHANDRA MURTHY, HINDU, AGED 61 YEARS, R/O CHINTAPALLI VILLAGE, VISAKHPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toAggrieved by the order dated 16-04-2022 in I.A.No. 19/2022 in O.S.No.284/2015 on the file the of the II Addl District Judge's Court, Visakhapatnam, IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in O.S.No.284/2015 on the file the of the II Addl District Judge's Court, Visakhapatnam, pending disposal of the above petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A S C BOSE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K SUBRAHMANYAM The Court made the following: ORDER: The present revision is filed against the order dated 16.04.2022 passed in I.A.No.19 of 2022 in O.S.No.284 of 2015 on the file of the learned II Additional District Judge, Visakhapatnam. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that, the cause in the revision petition does not survive. 3. The submission is placed on record. 4. In view of the same, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the instant revision and accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR 11th July, 2025 cbn 360 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1228 of 2022 11th July, 2025 cbn