Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 197676 (ALL)

RAM PRAKASH SINGH, ADO ( PANCHAYAT) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. PANCHAYATIRAJ VIBHAG, LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/13491/2025 · 2025-11-21

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13491 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties for payment of interest upon delayed payment of leave encashment amount of Rs.12,52,680/-. 3. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Director, Panchayatiraj Vibhag, U.P., Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of six weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order. 4. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. November 21, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashwani Kumar Singh, Ashok Kumar Yadava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Ram Prakash Singh, Ado ( Panchayat) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayatiraj Vibhag, Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench