JAMUNA YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/6352/2025 · 2025-10-15
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197673 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197673 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6352 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.95 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 87, 352, 351(3), 64(1) BNS, Section 3/4 of POCSO Act and Section 3(1)da, dha, 3(2)(V) of SC/ST Act, P.S.- Rajesultanpur, District- Ambedkar Nagar.
3. In terms of the FIR, it has been alleged that the daughter of the informant aged about 17 years was called by the applicant and on the false pretext of marriage, wrong was committed on her. Tentative age of the victim is around 17 years. In the statement of victim, she has reiterated the said facts.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the tentative age of the victim to be around 17 years and the fact that the victim stayed with the applicant for some time coupled with the fact that the applicant is in jail since 30.05.2025 and his criminal history has been duly explained in the present application, he is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Jamuna Yadav be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nijam Ahamad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Jamuna Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
October 15, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 6352 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench