HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER No. - 119 of 2001 Court No. - 20 HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J. 1. Case called out. None turned up on behalf of the appellant even on the revised call. 2. This Court vide order dated 26.07.2021 issued Card Notice to the appellant to engage another counsel on account of the death of the earlier counsel Sri B.R. Tripathi. 3. Office report dated 10.10.2025 shows that the service of notice upon the sole appellant is sufficient. Despite sufficient notice, neither the appellant is present nor his counsel is present to press the present appeal. 4. In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. November 12, 2025 Arun Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : B.R.Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.R.Khan, Jai Shreenet (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) Ayodhya Prasad Singh .....Appellant(s) Tej Bahadur Singh And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench