RAM BHAROSHI MEENA SON OF SHRI BODAN RAM MEENA v. DIRECTOR, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT
SAW/566/2023 · 2025-03-28
Inderjeet Singh, Pramil Kumar Mathur
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19765 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19765 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:14313-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 566/2023 Ram Bharoshi Meena Son Of Shri Bodan Ram Meena, Resident Of Dantwar, Tehsil Kathumar, District Alwar. ----Appellant Versus
1. Director, Social Welfare Department, 10, Jhalana Institutional Area, Jaipur.
2. Dy. Director, Social Justice Department, Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur.
3. Superintendent, Hostel, Social Welfare Department, Dudu, District Jaipur. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Mirza Faisal Baig, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, Additional Advocate General.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 28/03/2025 This appeal has been filed on behalf of the appellant (hereinafter to be referred as ‘employee’) against the order dated 12.04.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby the writ petition filed on behalf of the respondents (hereinafter to be referred as ‘employer’) was partly allowed and the employee was awarded a lumpsum compensation of Rs.1,75,000/- in lieu of his reinstatement and back wages. We have gone through the order dated 12.04.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge.
[2025:RJ-JP:14313-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-566/2023] In our considered view, the learned Single Judge has passed the order relying upon various judgments passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court as well as Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. Therefore, no case is made out for interference by this Court under the present appeal. Hence, this appeal is dismissed.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Tushar/141