1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.10989 of 2025 Date of decision: 10.07.2025 Pradeep Kumar. ...Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Mr. Subhash Mohan Snehi, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General for the respondents-State. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Rajan Kahol, Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioner is serving as Lecturer (Economics) at GSSS Ghiri, Tehsil Sunder Nagar, District Mandi. His grievance is that he has preferred a representation on 21.06.2025 (Annexure P-3) seeking his transfer on account of certain adverse family circumstances. However, the aforesaid representation has not been decided till date. -2- 3. Looking to the nature of the grievance raised in this writ petition, it would in the interest of justice to direct Competent Authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation dated 21.06.2025 (Annexure P-3) of the petitioner in accordance with law and as per applicable policy within a period of three weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, to also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 10th July, 2025 Judge (Pardeep)