Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 197624 (ALL)

SMT. MAMTA DEVI DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND NUTRITION LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/14981/2025 · 2025-12-19

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14981 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for opposite parties. 2. The present petition has been filed seeking the following main relief:- "(i) To issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus to opposite party No.2,3 & 4 to consider for appointment to the petitioner on vacant post of Anganwadi Worker in Anganwadi Centre Mavai Manjra Hathaura, Development Block Kachhauna, Tehsil Sandila, District Hardoi, in view of her eligibility as per the documents submitted by her in support of her online application dated 24-10-2024. (ii) To issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus to opposite party No.2,3 & 4 to consider and decide representation of the petitioner dated 22.7.2024 (Annexed as Annexure No.11) for appointment to the petitioner on vacant post of Anganwadi Worker in Anganwadi Centre Mavai Manjra Hathaura, Development Block Kachhauna, Tehsil Sandila, District Hardoi, in view of her eligibility as per the documents submitted by her in support of her online application dated 24-10-2024." 3. Learned State counsel has been provided written instructions Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajendra Prasad, Kuldeep Prakash, Rana Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Mamta Devi Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Child Development And Nutrition Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) dated 18.12.2025 which are taken on record and as per which it is submitted that petitioner is in fact placed at serial no.3 in the select list and does not have any primacy for consideration until and unless the first two selectees are considered. 4. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, without entering into merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before concerned authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided within a period of four weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 19, 2025 Subodh/- WRIA No. 14981 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench