Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 197622 (ALL)

SMT. RANI v. THE NAGAR AYUKT (MUNCIPAL COMMISSIONER), NAGAR NIGAM LKO. AND ANOTHER

WRIA/11927/2025 · 2025-10-09

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11927 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Shri K.K Pandey, Advocate on behalf of respondents is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Shri K.K Pandey, learned counsel for the respondents. 3. The present writ petition has been filed seeking following main relief(s):- " (I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, commanding the Opposite parties to pay the arrear of diffference salary in terms of 7th pay commission in between w.e.f 01.01.2016 upto February, 2019 to the petitioner. (II) Issue a writ or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Opposite parties to pay the arrear of ACP (Assured Career Progression) to the petitioner. (III) Issue a writ or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Opposite parties to consider and decide the representation dated 01.09.2025 which is contained as Annexure No. 10 to this writ petition" 4. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has moved a representation on 01.09.2025, but the same has not been decided till date. 5. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner has confined his prayer to the extent that respondent no. 1 i.e Nagar Ayukt (Municipal Commissioner), Nagar Nigam, Lucknow may be directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, within the stipulated time as may be framed by this court. 6. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 7. Be that as it may and without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage, with a direction to the Respondent No. 1 i.e Nagar Ayukt (Municipal Commissioner), Nagar Nigam, Lucknow to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 01.09.2025, if it is actually filed before him, in accordance with law, within a Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Vishwakarma Counsel for Respondent(s) : Namit Sharma Smt. Rani .....Petitioner(s) The Nagar Ayukt (Muncipal Commissioner), Nagar Nigam Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) period of two months from the date certified copy of this order is produced before him. October 9, 2025 DiVYa WRIA No. 11927 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench