Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3378 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant.
2. The present contempt application has been preferred for alleged non-compliance of
order dated 26.05.2025, the relevant extract is quoted hereinbelow:-
"Taking note of the fact of the case as also that the application for recall of the order is pending
consideration, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the opposite party No.1/Tehsildar, Tehsil-Kadipur, District Sultanpur to decide the pending application seeking recall within a period of two months. It is expected that after recall of the order, the case will be decided expeditiously, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned without granting any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties."
3. From the perusal of the order-sheet filed by the applicant as annexure-3, it is found that the applicant has filed an order-sheet of the case pending before the Tehsildar since 11.07.2025 till 15.09.2025 i.e. order-sheets of seven dates out of which on five dates the lawyers are abstaining from work. Under these circumstances, the delay in deciding the matter cannot be attributable to the respondent and it cannot be said that there is any wilful or intentional disobedience of the direction issued by the writ court.
4. In view of the facts and discussion made hereinabove, the present contempt application is devoid of merits and is thereby is dismissed.
5. Notice issued earlier, if any, stands discharged. October 17, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jitendra Kumar Pandey, Ankit Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Manish Kumar,J.) Adya Shankar .....Applicant(s) Umesh Chandra Yadav Tehsildar Tehsil Kadipur Dist. Sultanpur .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench