Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19760 (AP)

Vobbilisetti Chandramathi, v. Dandu Rama Krishna Raju,

CRP/1088/2022 · 2025-07-16

T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010276582022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1088/2022 Between: 1. VOBBILISETTI CHANDRAMATHI, W/O LATE SURYA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/O 22-63-6, BOBBILIVARI STREET, VISAKHAPATNAM-1. ...PETITIONER AND 1. DANDU RAMA KRISHNA RAJU, W/O VENKATA RAJAN RAJU, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, PROPRITOR, PADMASREE LODGE, R/O.48-19-3, DWARAKANAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM- 16. 2. VOBBILISETTI CHIDAMBARA RAO DIED 3. VOBBILISETTY UMA, W/O LATE CHIDAMBARA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/O.9-29-24/1, 1ST FLOOR, BRINDAVAN TOWERS, BALAJI NAGAR, SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. VOBBILISETTY SRINIVAS, S/O LATE CHIDAMBARA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. 9-29-24/1, 1ST FLOOR, BRINDAVAN TOWERS, BALAJI NAGAR, SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 5. VOBBILISETTY VINOD, S/O LATE CHIDAMBARA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. 9-29-24/1, 1ST FLOOR, BRINDAVAN TOWERS, BALAJI NAGAR, SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 6. KAPUGANTI SUDHA, W/O K. SRINIVAS, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O 11-5-36, VULLI VEEDHI, OPP. SURYA CLINIC, VIZIANAGARAM. ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to SET ASIDE the order dated 24.03.2022 passed in IA. No. 101 in AS. No. 17/2022 by the learned VII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam and ALLOW this Civil Revision Petition in the interest ofjustice and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent to pay the arrears of rentals Rs.87,00,000/- @ Rs.15,000/-per month from date of decree in OS NO. 187/2006 till date i.e15.02.2015 to 25.05.2022 plus Rs. 30,000/- per month regularly together with interest forthwith in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P RAJASEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. SRINIVASA RAO BODDULURI The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1088 of 2022 ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the revision petition does not survive. The said submission is placed on record. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Date : 17.07.2025 SPP 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR Civil Revision Petition No.1088 of 2022 Date : 17.07.2025 SPP