Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1976 (AP)

Pothula Samar Kumar, v. V Pradeep Kumar

CRP/3398/2025 · 2026-06-10

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010638482025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3398/2025 Between: 1. POTHULA SAMAR KUMAR,, S/O POTHULA SURESH, DOCTOR, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O PANDEKALLU VILLAGE, THUGGALI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 2. MALE VEERESH BABU, S/O MALE GIDDIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YRS. CULTIVATION, R/O RAMALAYA STREET, SHANTHI NAGAR, WADDEPALLI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT PREVIOUS 6-5-23, VENKATARAM NAGAR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. V PRADEEP KUMAR, S/O V A PATIL, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS. BUSINESS, R/O 19-21 H, BANDIMATTE STREET,KURNOOL 2. DINDUKURTHI RAM PRASAD, S/O DINDUKURTHI RAMA CHANDRAIAH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O 40-8-1, VIDYA NAGAR COLONY, KURNOOL ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to allow the CRP by setting aside the order passed in CFR NO. 7180 OF 2025 (EA No. /2025) in EP 2/2019 in PLC 3030/2017 n The file of the Principal District Judge, Kurnool and to grant such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in the E.P. No. 2 of 2019 in P.L.C. No. 3030 of 2017 on the file of Prl District Judge, Kurnool, pending disposal of main C.R.P. and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K MOHAN RAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. LAKSHMIKANTH REDDY DESAI The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: Sri B. Nagi Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri K. Mohan Rami Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks time to withdraw the present civil revision petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date : 11.06.2026 KBN/TVN 6 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3398 OF 2025 Date : 11.06.2026 KBN/TVN