HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12500 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the co-accused, Sushil Kumar, who is alleged to have appeared in the examination in place of the applicant, has been granted bail vide order dated 05.02.2024 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1282 of 2024. It is argued that case of the applicant is on a better footing than the co-accused who has already been granted bail. The applicant is in custody since 18.10.2025 and has no criminal antecedents. It is further submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated and has not committed any offence. It is further submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away after being released from jail or tampering with the witnesses. In case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail. Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts as argued by the learned counsel for the applicant. Upon due consideration to the fact that the co-accused Sushil Kumar has been granted bail, the charge-sheet has been filed, and the applicant is in custody since 18.10.2025 without any criminal history, I am of the view that a case for granting bail to the applicant is made out. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Deepak Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ranjeet Kumar Karsauliya .....Applicant(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Ranjeet Kumar Karsauliya, involved in Case Crime No.0510 of 2023, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC read with Section 4/10 of U.P. Public Examination Act, lodged at Police Station Aashiyana, District Lucknow, be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. Any other condition(s) which the trial court/concerned court may deem fit and proper, in the circumstances of the case, may also be imposed. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are confined to the present bail application and shall have no bearing on the merits of the trial. December 12, 2025 R.C. BAIL No. 12500 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench