Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 197589 (ALL)

NASEER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

BAIL/8948/2025 · 2025-10-17

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8948 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Counter affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 231 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 87, 142, 61(2), 64(2)(m), 89 BNS, Sections 5(I)/6, 5(j)(ii)/6 POCSO Act, Section 3(2)(v) SC/ST Act and Section 3/5(3) UP Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, P.S. Malhipur, District Shrawasti. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that information was given that a girl aged about 17 years was enticed by one Abdul Rahman, the co accused on the false pretext of marriage and with regard to the applicant and the other co accused it was stated that they had held her. It is argued that 3 of the co accused except Abdul Rahman have been enlarged on bail. 5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the fact that three of the co-accused have been enlarged on bail and no allegation of rape have been levelled against the application who is aged about 56 years, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 17.7.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arun Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Naseer .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s) application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant Naseer be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 17, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 8948 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench