Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 197585 (ALL)

BABU RAM v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SULTANPUR AND ANOTHER

A227/6224/2025 · 2025-10-17

Jaspreet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6224 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondents No.1 and 2 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of his Case No.4140 of 2025; Case No.D202504680004140 pending before the respondent No.2. Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.2 to consider and finally decide the pending proceedings of Case No.4140 of 2025; Case No.D202504680004140 as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. October 17, 2025 Harshita Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Babu Ram .....Petitioner(s) District Magistrate, Sultanpur And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench