HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9355 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Virendra Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Prashant Tripathi, the learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 124 of 2025 under Sections 409, 420, 120-B I.P.C. registered at Police Station- Mohanlalganj, District- Lucknow. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 17.04.2025 against a solitary named accused Pramod Kumar Upadhyaya, stating that the informant's wife had purchased a land through a sale deed dated 16.04.2019 but possession of the land was not delivered to her. The complainant has prayed in the F.I.R that the possession of the land be delivered to him. 4. During investigation, it came to light that the applicant was the Additional Director in the Company and, therefore, he has also been implicated. 5. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It has further been stated that the applicant used to work as a driver in the Company. 6. The applicant's involvement in five other cases has been disclosed in para 16 of the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, which are similar in nature and the applicant has been granted bail in one Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Virendra Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Madan Ram .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s) similar case, by means of an order dated 17.09.2025 passed by this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 8876 of 2025. 7. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail application and he has submitted that the allegations have been established during investigation and a charge-sheet has already been submitted on 06.09.2025. 8. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R, which has been lodged alleging non delivery of possession of a land purchased from the solitary named accused Pramod Kumar Upadhyaya in the year 2019; that the F.I.R prays for delivery of possession of land, which relief is essentially of a civil nature and that the applicant is languishing in jail since 10.07.2025 whereas the investigation stands concluded, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid case. 9. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 10. Let the applicant- Madan Ram be released on bail in the aforementioned case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. . (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) October 6, 2025 Preeti BAIL No. 9355 of 2025 2 Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench