SMT.SONAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/11921/2025 · 2025-12-19
Manjive Shukla, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197561 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197561 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11921 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner has prayed for the following substantial relief(s):
"i. a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding the opposite parties to provide the benefit of "Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojna" to the petitioner, in the interest of justice."
3. Upon consideration of the facts and circumstances, we are of the view that District Magistrate, Unnao being respondent No.2 should grant an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, and thereafter, pass a reasoned order in accordance with law within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
4. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. December 19, 2025 Ashutosh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dheerendra Kr. Agnihotri Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Smt.Sonam .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench