Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010276712024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2811/2024 Between:
1. M/S.V.S.N.CONSTRUCTIONS, REP.BY.ITS MANAGING PARTNER., R.SAI SANTHARAM S/O.R.VENKATA SIVAYYA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O. H .NO 64-1C-4A, TRESSARY COLONY, ,KAKINADA,EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. SMT Y SRI LAKSHMI, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TO GOVERNMENT STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. - 522 503.
2. SRI P VENKATA RAO, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KAKINADA DISTRICT.
3. J VENKATA RAO, KAKINADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP.BY.
COMMISSIONER ,KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT.
4. SRI S S RAWAT, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. 522503
5. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR R 5 IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 20/09/24 IN CC NO-2811 OF 2024.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondent herein for the willful, deliberate and wanton violation of the orders dt 20.02.2024 of this Honble Court made in WP. No. 3037/2024 and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SINGAMSETTY V.M. SANKAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU NAGURU
2. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA
3. J DILEEP KUMAR
4. B S SHIVAJI The Court made the following:
:: ORDER ::
The above contempt case is filed complaining about the non- implementation of the order dated 20.02.2024 in W.P.3037 of 2024.
2. Today, when the matter is listed, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the order dated 20.02.2024 in W.P.3037 of 2024, has been complied with and no further adjudication is required in the contempt case.
3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date : 08.04.2025 TVN
178 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
CONTEMPT CASE No.2811 OF 2024
Date : 08.04.2025 TVN