SURENDRA PAL VERMA v. SRI SATYENDRA KUMAR D.M. BARABANKI
CAPL/4573/2024 · 2025-10-17
Manish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197558 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197558 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4573 of 2024 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
1. Case has been called in the revised list.
2. Learned State Counsel on the basis of instructions received from the respondent has submitted that the representation of the applicant has been decided by order dated 01.12.2024 in compliance of judgment and order passed by the writ court dated 29.05.2024, a copy of the same has been provided during the course of argument, which is taken on record and it is further pointed out a photo-copy has also been forwarded to the applicant as there is an endorsement of the same in the order itself.
3. Neither the learned counsel for the applicant is present nor any request has been made on his behalf for adjournment of the case.
4. In view of the above, the contempt application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Notice issued, if any, stands discharged. October 17, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Farooqahmad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Manish Kumar,J.) Surendra Pal Verma .....Applicant(s) Sri Satyendra Kumar D.M. Barabanki .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench