DURGA PRAKASH PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/11623/2025 · 2025-10-07
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197555 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197555 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11623 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Heard Sri Jaspreet Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Deep Sikha, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State.
2. The instant petition has been filed with the following reliefs:-
"a. to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party No.2 and 3 to provide work to the Petitioner in every season. b. to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite party No.2 to decide the representation made by the Petitioner, c. to issue any other suitable order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper under the circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioner. d. to allow the writ petition with costs."
3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not being provided the work in every season, therefore, he has moved a representation dated 10.09.2025 before the District Magistrate/opposite party no. 2 and that has still not been decided yet. He submits that the purpose would be sub-served if the opposite party no. 2 may be directed to sympathetically consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the State could not dispute the aforesaid
contentions. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pratul Pratap Singh, Surya Nath Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Durga Prakash Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. In view of the aforesaid innocuous prayer, the opposite party no.2/District Magistrate, Sultanpur is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 10.09.2025 appended as annexure no. 1 alongwith this petition, within a period of 45 days, from the date, a certified copy of this
order is produced before him.
6. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of.
7. It is clarified that this Court has not dealt with this matter on merits. October 7, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 11623 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench