INDRASEN SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND 4 OTHERS
/7020/2025 · 2025-12-08
Subhash Vidyarthi
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197524 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197524 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7020 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Shri Vinod Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Hariom Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Ms. Mansi Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri Shikhar Anand, learned counsel for the respondent no.2
2. By means of the present petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought the issuance of a direction to the State Public Service Tribunal to decide the Claim Petition No.803/2025, expeditiously.
3. Record reveals that the claim petition was admitted on 14.05.2025 thereafter, written statements were invited which have already been filed. The petitioner filed an application for hearing of the matter on priority basis stating that the Departmental Promotion Committee meeting for promotion to the next higher post was scheduled to be held in the first week of November, 2025. The Tribunal rejected the priority application stating that the cause shown in the application was not sufficient.
4. There is no information in the instant petition regarding that meeting of the Departmental Promotion Committee having been held in the first week of November, 2025 or having been postponed to any other date, even the ground taken in the application filed before the Tribunal for granting priority in final hearing has not been substantiated by the petitioner in the instant Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinod Kumar Singh, Ananya Singh, Shilpi Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shikhar Anand Indrasen Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
petition.
5. It is matter of common knowledge that all the courts and tribunals are dealing with immense work load with numerous older matters being pending in consideration of all the courts, therefore, no direction can be issued at this stage for earlier disposal of matter filed in the year 2025 itself.
6. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed at this stage. December 8, 2025 V. Sinha A227 No. 7020 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench