Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 197520 (ALL)

LAL JI SAROJ v. SHRI VINAY KUMAR , ASSISTANT COLLECTOR , SADAR , PRATAPGARH

CAPL/3149/2023 · 2025-11-21

Manish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3149 of 2023 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. Heard. Present contempt application has been preferred for alleged non- compliance of the judgment and order dated 06.09.2022 passed in P.I.L. No. 578 of 2022. The relevant portion of the said judgment and order is quoted hereinbelow:- "Considering the aforesaid and the facts that the proceedings under Section 67(1) of the Code, 2006 has already been initiated and the matter is sub judice before the competent court thus, no fruitful purpose would be served to keep this case pending before this Court, thus, the present writ petition is disposed of finally. It is expected that the case under Section 67 (1) of the Code, 2006 shall be decided expeditiously." Learned Standing Counsel on the basis of instructions received has submitted that the proceedings under Section 67 (1) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 has been decided by passing orders on different dates in 30 matters. Copy of the list and the orders have been provided during the course of argument, which are taken on record. Photocopy of the same has been given to the learned counsel for the applicant. On the other hand learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that till date in pursuance of the orders passed under Section 67 (1) of the U.P. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanjeev Kumar Dwivedi, Salik Ram Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Lal Ji Saroj .....Applicant(s) Shri Vinay Kumar , Assistant Collector , Sadar , Pratapgarh .....Opposite Party(s) Revenue Code, 2006, no encroachment has been removed and possession has also not been given to the Gaon Sabha. For execution/implementation/compliance of the order passed under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, the applicant has a remedy to file an application under para 460 of the U.P. Revenue Court Manual. In view of the aforesaid, the present case is dismissed. November 21, 2025 Ashish CAPL No. 3149 of 2023 2 (Manish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench