REENA TEWARI AND 6 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/9890/2025 · 2025-11-21
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197510 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197510 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9890 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Sri Sunil Dixit, Advocate filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The instant application has been filed mainly with the prayer to quash the proceedings of Case No. 8717/2025, relating to Charge Sheet no. 1/2024 dated 5.11.2024 arising out of Case Crime No. 143/2024, Under Section 147, 323, 504, 506, 452 IPC, (State Versus Reena Tewari & others), relating to Police Station Malihabad, District Lucknow, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Custom) Lucknow and entire proceedings initiated thereof. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which is said to have taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as ANNEXURE NO. 4 to the application. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the parties concerned to appear before the trial court concerned within 2 weeks from today alongwith original compromise and the trial court is directed to verify the compromise within next 6 weeks. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rakesh Kumar Modanwal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Sunil Dixit Reena Tewari And 6 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of three month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 9.
Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if it has been filed, to the learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same. November 21, 2025 A.Nigam A482 No. 9890 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench