APHC010276892015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 26982/2015 Between: 1. JAVEED IQBAL S/O MOHD. YOUSUFF, 0CC: PVT. TEACHER R/O 36/49. CHITTAARI STREET KURNOOL ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER, Station Road Secunderabad ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS declaring the endorsement made by the respondent on an Acknowledgement letter dated 25-6-2015 in file No. HY1078628572715 directing to obtain declaratory order for change of date of Birth in Passport No A4 755875 during Renewal process as being Illegal, Arbitrary, Malafide, not only Contrary to the Circular No. VI/401/2/5/01 dated 29-10-2007, but also contrary to tne various judgments' rendered by this Honorable Court consequently direct the respondent to correct the date of birth from 28- 7-1975 to 25-3-1979 as well as father's name and renewed the same IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 35037 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may 2 be pleased to direct the respondent to renew the passport of the petitioner bearing No. A4 755875 by correcting the date of birth from 28- 7-1975 to 25-3-1979 as well as fathers name forthwith. IA NO: 4 OF 2015(WPMP 149978 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M MEHDI HUSSAIN Counsel for the Respondent: 1. T SUJAN KUMAR 2. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Despite the matter being posted today i.e., on 17.09.2025 under the caption ‘for Dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner. Even on 10.09.2025, 03.09.2025 and 12.08.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. 2. Therefore, it appears that the petitioner has no interest to prosecute the case. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 17th September, 2025 cbn 4 178 THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WP No.26982 of 2015 17th September, 2025 cbn