Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 197500 (ALL)

KARAN VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.

NA528/1794/2025 · 2025-11-14

Tej Pratap Tiwari

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1794 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. By means of the instant application, the applicant has prayed that this Court be pleased to direct the learned Court below not to insist the petitioner to file surety bond in each and each two cases and accept only two sureties in lieu of all the two cases. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that it has become impossible for the applicant to submit surety in each of case in which he has been granted bail. He added that the applicant has been granted bail in all cases arising out of following Case Crime Numbers :- 1) Case Crime No.434/2025, under Sections 109 (1) BNS & 3/25 Arms Act, PS Para, District Lucknow. 2) Case Crime No. 433 of 2025, under Sections 305 A, 331 (3) and 317 (2) BNS, PS Para District Lucknow. 4. He next added that despite the Trial Court granted the bail, the applicant is still in jail and the applicant being poor person is unable to produce the sureties in each cases. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018] the Supreme Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the petitioner to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. 5. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the applicant to furnish a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Sahay Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Karan Verma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) the like amount in one case, which shall be treated to be valid in all other cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. November 14, 2025 mks NA528 No. 1794 of 2025 2 (Tej Pratap Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANISH SAXENA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench