TRIVENI v. CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, BALRAMPUR AND OTHERS
A227/6662/2025 · 2025-11-15
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197486 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197486 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6662 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Ms. Aliya Ikram holding brief to Shri Mohd. Waris Farooqui, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.1- i.e. Consolidation Officer, Balrampur to consider and decide the proceedings of Case No. 200254081076010062 (Amarnath Vs. Triveni) in relation to the property situated in Village Basavan Bankat, Tehsil Utraula, District Balrampur, within a time frame as stipulated by this Hon'ble Court. .
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.1 - Consolidation Officer, Balrampur is desired to make all endeavor to decide the proceedings of Case No. 200254081076010062 (Amarnath Vs. Triveni) in relation to the property situated in Village Basavan Bankat, Tehsil Utraula, District Balrampur,, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Waris Farooqui Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Triveni .....Petitioner(s) Consolidation Officer, Balrampur And Others .....Respondent(s)
adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. . November 15, 2025 Muk A227 No. 6662 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench