PINTU KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/8089/2025 · 2025-10-17
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197467 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197467 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8089 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.103 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) BNS and Section 5/6 of POCSO Act and Sections 3(2)(v), 3(2)(v-a) of SC/ST Act , P.S.- Ahirauli, District- Ambedkar Nagar.
3. In terms of the FIR, it has been alleged that the daughter of the informant aged about 15 years was enticed away by some unknown person. Subsequently, in the statement of victim, she has stated that she knew the applicant and had gone with him to Delhi. The victim refused to undergo medico-legal examination.
4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the aforesaid statement and the fact that the victim had gone to Delhi with the applicant and she has refused for her medico-legal examination coupled with the fact that the applicant is in jail since 05.04.2025 having no criminal history, he is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Pintu Kumar be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Santosh Kumar Srivastava, Himanshu Singh, Saurabh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Pintu Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
October 17, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 8089 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench