SUNDER LAL RATHOR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/9519/2025 · 2025-11-17
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197465 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197465 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9519 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record. 2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants for quashing of the entire proceedings of Criminal Misc. Case No. 4811 of 2024, State v. Sunder Lal Rathor and others, in pursuance of Chargesheet No. 01 of 2023 dated 02.06.2023 arising out of Case Crime No./First Information Report No. 37 of 2023, under Section 323, 504, 506, I.P.C. relating to Police Station Saadatganj, District Lucknow, pending before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate- VIII, Court No. 32, Lucknow, as well as summoning order dated 11.01.2024 passed by Learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VIII, Court No. 32, Lucknow (Contained as Annexure Nos. 1 and 2). 3. After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the applicants submit that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicants may be permitted to move discharge application through counsel and suitable directions may be issued for expeditious disposal of the same. 4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in grant of aforesaid prayer. 5. In view of above, it is provided that applicants are permitted to move their discharge application(s) through counsel within two weeks from today and in case any such application(s) are being filed, same shall be heard and decided expeditiously, say within 6 weeks of filing of the same, after hearing the parties, in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order. 6. Till the aforesaid period of six weeks and during pendency of discharge application, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicants in the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amrit Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sunder Lal Rathor And Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
aforesaid case. 7. In case of failure on the part of applicants in moving the discharge application(s) within the aforesaid period, they will not be entitled to the benefit of this order. 8. With above directions, this application stands disposed of.
November 17, 2025 A.Nigam A482 No. 9519 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench