KAMLESH KUMAR BERWA andORS v. SHRI SUDARSHAN SETHI AND OTHERS
CCP/730/2016 · 2025-09-01
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19746 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19746 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:35140] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 730/2016 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2509/2016
1. Kamlesh Kuamr Berwa S/o Shri Kanhaiyalal Berwa Aged about 24 years R/o Village Choradiyawas Post Palunda Tehsil Ramgarhpachwara Distt. Dausa (raj)
2. Dinesh Kumar Berwa S/o Shri Ramdhan Berwa aged about 30 years R/o Village Gumanpura Tehsil Sikrai Distt. Dausa
3. Rajendra Prasad Lodwal S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad, Aged about 31 years R/o Village Nangal Govind Tehsil Lawan Distt. Dausa (Raj)
4. Nand Singh Rajput S/o Shri Mahendra Singh Aged about 21 years R/o Village Thanadundpuri Tehsil Rajgarh Distt. Dausa (Raj) ----Petitioners Versus
1. Shri Sudarshan Sethi Principal Secretary Department of Rural Development of Panchayati Raj Dept. Govt of Rajasthan Secretariat Jaipur
2. Shri Anand Kumar Commissioner & Secretary Panchayati Raj Dept. Jaipur Rajasthan
3. Shri Rajiv Singh Thakur Director cum Secretary State Mission Rajasthan Rural Livelihood Project and Rajasthan Rural Panchayati Raj Dept. Jaipur Rajasthan
4. Shri Rajiv Singh Thakur Rajasthan Rural Livelihood Development Council Through its Secretary Jaipur
5. Shri Rajiv Singh Thakur Secretary Rajasthan Rural Livelihood Development Council Jaipur ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1265/2016 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5209/2016 Suo-Moto ----Petitioner Versus President/secretary Nari Shakti Mahila Uttam Sansthan Alooda ----Respondent
[2025:RJ-JP:35140] (2 of 2) [CCP-730/2016] For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Order 01/09/2025 Since, the writ petition has been dismissed today vide separate order, this Court does not propose to proceed further in the contempt matters. The contempt petitions are dismissed accordingly. Notices are discharged.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J PRAGATI/357-358