Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19746 (AP)

D RAJINI v. THE STATE OF AP

CRLP/5707/2025 · 2025-06-04

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

6' I TTETTTTT=EEEEEEE lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5707 OF 2025 Between.I Smt D. Rajini, W/o. Pawan Kumar, aged 38 years, Occ: House Wife, R/o. 25- 36-207, Santhapeta, Ongole Town, Prakasam District. ..,PETITIONER / ACCUSED No.2 AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its public prosecutor, High Court, Amaravathi, through SHO, KavalI-Rural Police Station, SPSR Nellore District ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Petition under section 482 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Police to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused on Bail in the event of her Arrest pursuant to Crime No.70/2025 on the file of the SHO, Kavali Rural Police Station, SPSR Nellore Distrl'ct This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri Srinivasulu Kurra, Advocate for the petitioner and the public prosecutor (AP) on behalf of the Respondent The Court made the following Order: I)I E + APHCO10277162O25 lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Ju+I-SdiCtiOn) [3505] THURSDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM _Q_R[MINAL PET]T[ON NO: 5707/202§_ Between : D Rajini AND The State OfAp I Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.SRINIVASULU KURRA ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED .URESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER-I Learned counsel for the petitioner brought to the notice of this court that in view of subsequent events after filing this petition, the cause in the /,'s does not survive for adjudication and reported that the matter has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the criminal Petition is a/,-sm,-ssec/ as infructuous. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. Sd/-G HELA NAIDU //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To] 1. The Station House Officer, Kavali Rural Police Station, SPSR Nellore District 2. One CC to Sri Srinivasulu Kurra, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CC to Public Prosecutor, High Court ofAndhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. [OUT] 4. Three CD Copies MV Vna 9. a -,fa Vacation court HIGH COURT DATED: 05/06/2025 ORDER CRLP.No.5707 of 2025 DISMISSING THE CRLP AS INFRUCTUOUS