1 2025:CGHC:46312 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3268 of 2023 1 - Smt. Panmeshwari Painkra W/o Shri Amelal, Aged About 28 Years By Caste- Kanwar, Working As A Anganbadi Worker And Posted At Anganbadi Center, Makanpur, Village Makanpur, Tahsil Pratappur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh, R/o Village - Makanpur, Tahsil Pratappur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Women And Child Development And Welfare Department, Raipur, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Commissioner Surguja, Division, Ambikapur District Surguja Chhattisgarh. 3 - Collector, Surajpur, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Project Officer, Women And Child Development And Welfare Department, Janpad Panchayat - Pratappur, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Smt. Anita Painkra D/o Chamru Ram, R/o Village Makanpur, Tahsil Pratappur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh. RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Pathak, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandye, G.A. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 10/09/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition and issue appropriate writ, order or direction to quash the impugned order dated 20.04.2023 (Annexure P/1) passed by Commissioner Surguja, Division, Ambikapur, Distt. Surguja (C.G.), which relates to the petitioner. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash impugned order dated 29.03.2023 (Annexure P/2) passed by The Respondent no. 3, Collector, Surajpur, Distt. Surajpur (C.G.), which relates to the petitioner. 10.3 That, Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper may also be passed in favour of the petitioner together with cost of the petition.” 3 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the afflux of time, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent/State agreed with the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner and has no objection. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat