N.22Sl 151/CL 07.01.25 Sl.18 Ct.33 (S.R.) WPA 6129 of 2008 Shib Kumar Roy v. Union of India & Ors. Mr. Pulakesh Bajpayee Mr. Rahul Sarkar … for the respondents/UOI. None appears to represent the petitioner though the learned advocate representing the respondents is present. The affidavit-in-opposition filed by the learned advocate on behalf of the respondent nos.1 to 8 be kept on record. From the conduct of the petitioner it appears that he is not interested to proceed with the hearing of the instant writ petition and the same is dismissed for non- prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)