MOHD. IMRAN KHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/10657/2025 · 2025-11-10
Pankaj Bhatia
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197448 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197448 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10657 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. Despite service of notice, no one appeared on behalf of the complainant. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.172 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 115(2), 87, 65(1) of BNS and Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, Police Station Jaitpur, District Ambedkar Nagar. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant was missing and was enticed by some unkown person. Subsequently, in the statements, the victim stated that she had gone out of her anger from her home when she met the applicant and stayed with him at his sister's house for two days and thereafter she stayed with the applicant in a room in a hotel. The victim has refused to undergo medical examination as nothing wrong was done to her. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the statements of the victim and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 15.09.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Mohd. Imran Khan be released on bail in the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rama Niwas Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohd. Imran Khan .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
aforesaid first information report on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
November 10, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 10657 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench