- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20067 CRP No. 172 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 172 OF 2025 (IO-) BETWEEN: 1. M.ABDUL KAREEM S/O LATE S.M.MUNEER AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 2. MRS. S.M.RIZWANA BEGUM W/O LATE S.M.MUNEER AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 3. MS. HEENA KAUSER D/O LATE S.M.MUNEER AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS 4. MS. AMREEN KAUSER D/O LATE S.M.MUNEER AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 5. TOUSIF PASHA S/O LATE S.M.MUNEER AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS PETITIONERS NO.1 TO 5 ARE RESIDING AT NO.2, D.M.LANE MARUTHI COMPLEX, 3RD CROSS KALASIPALYAM MAIN ROAD BENGALURU - 560 002. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI HUSSAIN MUEEN FAROOQ, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20067 CRP No. 172 of 2025 AND: 1. SMT. R.VIJAYALAKSHMI W/O LATE B.R.RANGASWAMY AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS 2. SMT. B.R.SUPRIYA D/O LATE B.R.RANGASWAMY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS 3. B.R.DILIP KUMAR S/O LATE B.R.RANGASWAMY AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 4. SMT. SHUBHA ROMESH PATEL D/O LATE B.R.RANGASWAMY W/O ROMESH VIJAY PATEL AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/AT NO.191, 3RD CROSS 18TH MAIN, 6TH BLOCK KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 095. 5. B.R.KAVITHA D/O LATE B.R.RANGASWAMY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 6. B.R.KASTURI RANGAIAH S/O LATE B.R.RANGASWAMY AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO 3, 5 AND 6 ARE RESIDING AT NO.101, RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU - 560 020 RESPONDENT NOS. 1, 2, 4 TO 6 ARE - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20067 CRP No. 172 of 2025 REP. BY THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER B.R.DILIP KUMAR THE RESPONDENT NO.3. …RESPONDENTS THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 READ WITH SECTION 151 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE 1908, AGAINST SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 21/01/2025 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE XLIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE BENGALURU – CCH-44, IN O.S.NO.2924/2023 (ANNEXURE-A). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition. 2. The memo reads as follows: “MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL The counsel for the petitioner humbly submits that this petitioner has now decided to withdraw the above petition as not pressed. For the reasons stated above the petitioner most respectfully prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20067 CRP No. 172 of 2025 to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above revision petition as not pressed in the interest of justice.” In terms of the memo, the civil revision petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE NVJ List No.: 2 Sl No.: 32 CT:SS