Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19737 (GAU)

MOHESWAR BORA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Crl.)/1068/2025 · 2025-09-18

Pranjal Das

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010216502025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/1068/2025 MOHESWAR BORA SON OF LATE SHIBO BORA RESIDENT OF SHANTIPUR DULIA GAON, PO, PS AND DISTRICT JORHAT, ASSAM. 2: SHRI PADMADHAR BORA SON OF LATE SHIBO BORA RESIDENT OF SHANTIPUR DULIA GAON PO PS AND DISTRICT JORHAT ASSAM. 3: SHRI RAJANI BORA SON OF LATE SHIBO BORA RESIDENT OF SHANTIPUR DULIA GAON PO PS AND DISTRICT JORHAT ASSAM. 4: SHRI KONBAP BORA ALIS KONLORA SON OF LATE TELEKA BORAH RESIDENT OF SHANTIPUR DULIA GAON PO PS AND DISTRICT JORHAT ASSAM. 5: SHRI RATUL BORA SON OF LATE GETHURAM BORA RESIDENT OF SHANTIPUR DULIA GAON PO PS AND DISTRICT JORHAT ASSAM. 6: SHRI DEBENDRA NATH BORA SON OF LATE GOBARDHAN BORA Page No.# 2/3 RESIDENT OF SHANTIPUR DULIA GAON PO PS AND DISTRICT JORHAT ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE LD. P.P. ASSAM 2:PRABIN CHANDRA SAIKIA SON OF LATE DIMBESWAR SAIKIA RESIDENT OF SANTIPUR NEEMATI ROAD BY PASS CHARIALI JOPRHAT PS AND PO JORHAT DISTRICT JORHAT ASSAM PIN 785101 3:SMT RANJITA SAIKIA DAUGHTER OF LATE DIMBESWAR SAIKIA RESIDENT OF SANTIPUR NEEMATI ROAD BY PASS CHARIALI JOPRHAT PS AND PO JORHAT DISTRICT JORHAT ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : K AHMED, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR. T J MAHANTA BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER 19.09.2025 Heard Mr. K. Ahmed, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. T. J. Mahanta, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. S. M. Rahman, learned counsel for the respondent/bail petitioner. The applicants herein are stated to be all the informants of F.I.R. Page No.# 3/3 dated 11.07.2025 giving rise to Jorhat P.S. Case No.350/2025 in which the accused petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail. The applicants are seeking impleadment as party respondents in the Anticipatory Bail Application. Mr. T. J. Mahanta, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent/petitioner of the bail petition has fairly submitted that he has no objection. In view of the above, the applicants herein are allowed to be impleaded as party respondents in the connected Anticipatory Bail Application. The I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant