OM VEER SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/4797/2024 · 2025-10-06
Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197359 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197359 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4797 of 2024 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J.
HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. This Court has passed order dated 23.7.2024, which reads as under:-
"Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State/respondents and perused the record. By means of this petition, the petitioner has sought quashing of F.I.R. dated 05.05.2024, bearing Case Crime/FIR No.0134/2024, for the offence under Sections 323, 504, 494, 498-A I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, registered at Police Station - Jankipuram, District - Lucknow North (Commissionerate Lucknow).
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that since the dispute is matrimonial in nature, therefore, there are chances of compromise between the parties, therefore, the matter may be referred to the Medication and Conciliation Center. To show his bonafide he has placed before this Court a Demand Draft of Rs.40,000/- drawn in favour of the respondent No.4. In the circumstances, let notice be issued to respondent No.4 - Smt. Meena Kumari, to be served through respondent No.3/S.H.O., Police Station - Jankipuram, District - Lucknow for appearance of respondent No.4 before this Court on 29th July, 2024.
Learned counsel for the petitioner shall retain the Demand Draft in his Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar Singh, Arun Kumar Patel, Shamim Arif Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Adarsh Shukla, Mohd. Asim, Prince Singh Om Veer Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
possession to be produced before this court on 29th July, 2024. List this case on 29th July, 2024, amongst top 10 cases in the list. Till the next date of listing, it is provided that the petitioner - Om Veer Singh shall not be arrested on the basis of the impugned First Information Report dated 05.05.2024, bearing Case Crime/FIR No.0134/2024, for the offence under Sections 323, 504, 494, 498-A I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, registered at Police Station - Jankipuram, District - Lucknow North (Commissionerate Lucknow)."
3. In terms of the aforesaid order, the parties appeared before the Mediation Centre of this Court. The mediation report dated 17.2.2025 reads
"Mediation completed. No agreement."
4. In view of the aforesaid, since the mediation could not be successful, therefore, learned counsel for the parties have requested that this writ petition may be disposed of finally.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that the offence under which the F.I.R. has been lodged are having punishment up-to 7 years, therefore, the petitioner is entitled for the benefit of the dictum of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2022) 10 SCC 51.
6. Learned A.G.A. has also produced the copy of instruction/letter dated
23.9.2025. As per the aforesaid instruction, the investigation has been completed and the charge sheet has been produced before the Supervisory Authority and the same may be sent to court very soon. 7 . In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present writ petition, therefore, the same is disposed of finally directing the parties to take appropriate legal recourse before the appropriate court of law. . (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) October 6 , 2025 Anuj Singh CRLP No. 4797 of 2024 2
Digitally signed by :- ANUJ PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench