AVINASH CHANDRA v. STATE OF U.P.THROU PRIN.SECY.HOME DEPTT.LKO.AND ORS.
CRPIL/3826/2014 · 2025-10-10
Rajan Roy, Rajeev Bharti
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197355 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197355 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL WRIT-PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION No. - 3826 of 2014 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
1. This petition was filed in the year 2014 and was treated as one in Public Interest Litigation.
2. As regards relief nos.1 to 5 are concerned, the petitioner, who is a practicing Advocate of this Court, appears in person, and states that the FIRs were lodged and subsequently settlement/compromise has been arrived at, therefore, those reliefs have become of no use, however, he wishes to press relief no.(vi). We are of the opinion that such reliefs cannot be confined only for advocates rather it should be for the general public including the advocates.
3. We grant liberty to the petitioner herein to move an appropriate application before the Director General of Police, U.P. raising his grievance with regard to the said subject matter, but before it, it would be better if he seeks information from the Director General of Police himself as to what is the mechanism put in place as of now for protecting the rights of those who visit the police stations whether on being summoned by the police personnel under any statute or on their own so that they are not ill-treated, harassed in any manner. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Kalra, K.Saran Counsel for Respondent(s) : Govt.Advocate, Divendu Tripathi, Nadeem Murtaza Avinash Chandra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Throu Prin.Secy.Home Deptt.Lko.And Ors. .....Respondent(s)
4. If any such application is filed, then the Director General of Police can consider the same and do whatever is necessary or required to be done. It is also open for the petitioner to move such application before the State Government, which shall be considered as per law.
5. The petition is disposed of accordingly. October 10, 2025 Anand/- CRPIL No. 3826 of 2014 2 (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench