HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9362 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Amit Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondent 1 to 3. 2. In the light of proposed order notice to private respondent is dispensed with. 3. Present petition has been filed for following reliefs :- "I. A writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties concerned to decide the representation/application under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code Manual, 2006 as contained in Annexure No. 1 to this petition in stipulated time period in the interest of justice. II. Issue any other writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court deems fit just and proper be also passed in favour of the petitioner. III. Allow this petition with costs." 4. It is noticed that the land on which eviction has been sought is Gaon Sabha land and accordingly does not vest in the petitioner and present writ petition is not a public interest litigation. 5. Undoubtedly, the petitioner cannot be said to be an aggrieved person falling under the provisions of Article 226/227 of the Constitution of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Kumar Gupta, Anit Vishal Srivastav, Ramendra Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey Uttam Kumar @ Ram Naresh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) India and therefore, present writ petition in this regard would not be maintainable. 6. Accordingly, present writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable. 7. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move appropriate petition/application for redressal of his grievance. October 7, 2025 A. Verma WRIC No. 9362 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench