VIDYASAGAR RAJBHAR ALIAS LADDU v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
BAIL/5461/2025 · 2025-02-26
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19735 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19735 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:27845 Court No. - 84 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5461 of 2025 Applicant :- Vidyasagar Rajbhar Alias Laddu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anurag Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Sri Anurag Upadhyay, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rakesh Shukla, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records.
2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.0015 of 2025, under Sections 2/3 (1) of Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, registered at Police Station Madhuban, District Mau.
3. The gang chart mentions involvement of the applicant in two cases, in which he has been granted bail. In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case.
4. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter.
5. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the applicant is languishing in jail since 18.01.2025 and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement
of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime.
6. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.
7. Let the applicant- Vidyasagar Rajbhar Alias Laddu be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) Order Date :- 27.2.2025 Ram. Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad