Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19734 (JHR)

MANOJ DAS ALIAS MANOJ KUMAR DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6892/2025 · 2025-08-08

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:23036 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6892 of 2025 --------- Manoj Das @ Manoj Kumar Das, s/o Late Shanichar Ravidas @ Sanichar Das, aged 46 years, r/o Keshwari, Panchayat Barwadih, Block Suriya, P.O. Keshwari, P.S. Suriya, District Giridih. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Yogesh Modi, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, A.P.P. --------- 02/Dated:-08.08.2025 1. Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 108/3(5) BNS in connection with Saria P.S. Case No.31/25. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that from the materials collected during investigation, there is no evidence to the effect that petitioner abated the deceased in any manner whatsoever to commit suicide and the petitioner was in good terms with the petitioner. He further submits that during pendency of the bail application, a compromise petition (Annexure-2) was filed before the court below stating therein that the petitioner has been implicated in this case due to misconception and by mistake. He further submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedents and petitioner for no offence has been languishing in custody since 06.05.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegation made against this petitioner coupled with the compromise 2025:JHHC:23036 2 petition (Annexure-2), I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JM 1st Class, Giridih in connection with Saria P.S. Case No.31/25. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) vikas/-