MOHD. NAIM AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO AND OTHERS
CRLP/1157/2024 · 2025-10-10
Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197334 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197334 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1157 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1.Case called out. None is present on behalf of the petitioners, whereas, learned A.G.A and learned counsel for the complainant are present.
2. It has been submitted that the statement under Sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C had been recorded in which the prosecution has been supported.
3. In view of above, the petition has lost its efficacy and the same is dismissed for want of prosecution October 10, 2025 Shahnaz Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pradyumn Shukla, Qasim Abbas Zaidi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Krishan Kumar (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Mohd. Naim And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Civil Sectt. Lko And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench