/J/ 4/ lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMA THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF M TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SR[ JUSTICE HARINATH CRIMINAL PETITION NO= 5698 OF 2025 Between : 1. Jyothi AniI Kumar @ AniI, S/o. Ankulu, Aged about 35 years, 18A, Kasai Street, Kavali,SPSR Nellore District. 2. Navuru Venkatrao, S/o. Malakondaiah, Jammalapalem Village, Jaladanki MandaI, SPSR Nel!ore District. .... Petitioners/Accused No.6 and 7 AND The State OfAndhra Pradesh, Through S.H.O Kavali 2 Town P.S SPSR Nellore District, Rep.by public prosecutor, High court ofAndhra Pradesh ....Respondent/Complainant Petition under Section 482 of BNSS r/w, Section 438/Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased-to grant interim bail to the petitioners /Accused No.6 and 7 connecting in Crime No.75 of 2020 on the file of Kavali 2 Town RS, SRSR Nellore District and to pass !ANO: 1 OF2025 Petition under Section 482 of-`CrPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidav'it fjI`6d jn support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim bail to the -petitioners /Accused No.6 and 7 connecting in Crime No.75 of 2020 on the file of KavaII' 2 Town P.S, SPSR Nellore District, Pending disposal of CRLP 5698 of 2025, on the file of the High Court. Counsel forthe Petitioners : SRI LINGALA HAZARATHAIAH Counsel for the Respondent : Assistant public Prosecutor The Court made the following ORDER: APHCO10276022025 ERE IN THE HIG'H COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (special original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N PETITION NO: 5698/2025 CRIMINAL Between : Jyothi Anil Kumar @ Anil and Others AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh counsel for the petitioner/accused(S): [3521] ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT \7 1. LINGALA HAZARATHAIAH counsel for the Respondent/COmPlainant: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following Order: The petit'lonerS are arrayed aS Accused Nos.6 and 7 in Crime No.75 of 2020 on the file Of the Kavali ll Town Police Station, SPSR Nellore District, for the offences registered under sections 447, 427, 307,120 (B) I/w 34 I/w 109 of lpc and section 3 of PDPP Act. 2. lt iS Submitted by the learned COunSel for the Petitioners that the petitioners are arrayed as Accused Nos.6 and 7 in Crime No.75 of 2020. lt is submitted that the petitioners.Q9>.mmitted the OffenCeS under Sections 447 and - ¢s _-~--- _ _ 427 of lPC and Section 3 of PDPP Act on the file of Kavali ll Town Police Station, SPSR Nellore District. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that after registration of the said crime, an enquiry was conducted and the police have initially closed the case as undetected. Thereafter on 07.04.2025, SPDO Kavali issued instructions for reopening the case and for taking up further investigation. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on the instructions of SPDO, dated 07.04.2025, now the provision of law is altered and Sections 307, 120(b), 109 r/w 34 of lPC were added to the initial allegations. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. 4. lt is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that on account of political differences, the petitioners are now being troubled with respect to the case which was closed on 19.09.2023. 5. On perusing the record, it is observed that the land of the subject structure was considered as gramakantam land and the structure was demolished on the midnight of 10.04.2020. lt is also recorded by the investigating officer that there was no CCTV footage `available within the vicinity of the alleged demolition which was occurred on the mid night of 10.04.2020. + --3--;i-,. t`l -I _I 6. Learned Assistant public prosecutor submits that the then investigating offl'cer has simply recorded tha.I the CCTV footages were not available and that the cameras were offline. It is suspected that the investI'gatl-ng officer closed the case and could not complete the jnvestigatl'on in the desired manner. 7. Be that as it may, considering the submissions, this court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners in the event of thel'r arrest, subject to the following condition.I- The petitioners shall enlarge on bail jn the event of their arrest upon furnishing a personal bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, along with two sureties for a like sum each, to the satisfaction of the station House officer, Kavali l! Town Police Station, spsR NeIIore District. 8. With the above condition, the criminal petition is allowed. M[-scellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the crI-minal Petition, sha" stand closed. rTE-. fp, //TRUE COPY// SD/-M.SRINIVAS / ASsS:ScTT:ON#§IIcS:RRAR To] 1. The Additional Judl. Magistrate Of I Class, Kavali. 2, The Station House Officer, Kava!i 2 Town P.S, Kaval'I, SPSR Nellore District. 3. One CC to SRI. LINGALA HAZARATHAIAH Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court ofAndhra pradesh.[OUT] 5. One spare COPY I- \ +I. HIGH COURT HN,J DATED :29/05/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.5698 of 2025 ALLOWED v_ng , _`*faA , I. ~^tTSdr5a` ,`: