HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9881 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Sri Rajesh Kumar, Advocate, is present on behalf of the opposite party Nos. 2 to 4 by filing his Vakalatnama, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P., learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 to 4 and perused the record. 3. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants praying for quashing of the entire proceedings of Case Crime No.: 793 of 2010, State V/s Kunwar Amika Singh and Others, Under-Section 147,148,149,307,504 and 506 Indian Penal Code, Police Station: Madiaon, District: Lucknow., pending in the court of Special Judge, P.C-8, District: Lucknow, and also chargesheets dated 28.12.2010 and 22.11.2010 and impugned Cognizance order and Summoning Order issued dated 24.02.2011 and 23.12.2011 passed against the applicants by the Learned Magistrate - II-nd as well as ACJM-V-th, District- Lucknow as Contained in Annexure No. 1 to this Petition, in respect of the applicants. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned counsel for opposite party Nos. 2 to 4 jointly submitted that vide order dated 11.03.2025 a direction was given to the trial court to verify the factum of compromise executed by the parties. In pursuance of the aforesaid order, learned trial court had verified the contents of compromise. 5. Learned counsel for the applicants and learned counsel for opposite party Nos.2 to 4 jointly submitted that the parties have entered into compromise, which has duly been verified by the trial court vide report dated 25.03.2025. 6. Learned A.G.A. has fairly conceded that compromise has been effected between the parties and the same has duly been verified by the trial court. 7. Hon'ble Apex Court in catena of decisions has held that inherent power can be used Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sudhir Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Rajesh Kumar Ambika Singh @ Dabbu @ Kunwar Ambika Singh And 6 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) to do real and substantial justice as has been held in Gian Singh Vs State of Punjab, 2012 AIR SCW 5333, B.S. Joshi and others Vs State of Haryana, (2003) 3 SCC 675 and Narinder Singh Vs State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466. Hence, inherent power can be exercised to speed up the process of ending the criminal proceedings where the settlement is arrived at between the parties. 8. In view of the aforesaid and the fact that parties do not want to pursue the case any further, the matter is purely of personal nature, which has been mutually settled between the parties by way of the compromise, injury report brought on record as Annexure-4 to the instant applicant indicates that the injury are simple in nature and on the non-vital part, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further. 9. For the discussions made above, the present application is allowed. The proceedings of Case Crime No.: 793 of 2010, State V/s Kunwar Amika Singh and Others, Under-Section 147,148,149,307,504 and 506 Indian Penal Code, Police Station: Madiaon, District: Lucknow., pending in the court of Special Judge, P.C-8, District: Lucknow, and also chargesheets dated 28.12.2010 and 22.11.2010 and impugned Cognizance order and Summoning Order issued dated 24.02.2011 and 23.12.2011 passed against the applicants by the Learned Magistrate -II-nd as well as ACJM-V-th, District- Lucknow as Contained in Annexure No. 1 to this Petition, in respect of the applicants herein, are hereby quashed. November 21, 2025 A.Nigam A482 No. 9881 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench