Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19732 (GAU)

MANAK RAM v. THE UNION OF INDIA

I.A.(Crl.)/1062/2025 · 2025-09-18

Mridul Kumar Kalita

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010215722025 2025:GAU-AS:13052 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/1062/2025 MANAK RAM S/O SHRI BAGARU RAM R/O VILL- SADARI PEELWA PHALODI, P.S. LOHAWAT, DIST. JODHPUR, RAJASTHAN, PIN CODE- 342001. 2: ISA RAM S/O KHIYA RAM R/O VILL- HANUMAN NAGAR BHER BLOCK P.S. OSIAN PHALODI P.O. PHALODI RAJASTHAN-342301 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE STANDING COUNSEL, NCB. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N J DUTTA, B AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : SC, NCB, In Case : Bail Appln./2277/2025 MANAK RAM AND ANR S/O SHRI BAGARU RAM R/O VILL- SADARI PEELWA PHALODI P.S. LOHAWAT DIST. JODHPUR RAJASTHAN Page No.# 2/3 PIN CODE- 342001. 2: ISA RAM S/O KHIYA RAM R/O VILL- HANUMAN NAGAR BHER BLOCK P.S. OSIAN PHALODI P.O. PHALODI RAJASTHAN-342301. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE STANDING COUNSEL NCB. ------------ Advocate for : MR. N J DUTTA Advocate for : SC NCB appearing for THE UNION OF INDIA BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 19.09.2025 1. Heard Mr. N.J. Dutta, the learned counsel for the applicants. Also heard Ms. M. Deka, the learned counsel for the NCB. 2. This interlocutory application has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Manak Ram and Isa Ram, in connection with Bail Application No. 2277/2025. 3. By this application, the petitioners have prayed for correcting the case number of the Trial Court case, which was wrongly typed in the impugned order as NDPS Case No. 142/2024, instead of correct case number, i.e., NDPS Case No. 142/2025. Page No.# 3/3 4. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for both sides and have gone through the records of Bail Application No. 2277/2025. 5. It appears that the error has been crept in the Bail Application as well as in the order dated 08.09.2025 passed in Bail Application No. 2277/2025, due to inadvertent typographical mistake. Same is required to be corrected to give effect to the Bail order. 6. Accordingly, this interlocutory application is allowed, and it is hereby directed that wherever reference of the case No. 142/2024 has been made, in the aforesaid bail order, it shall be read as NDPS Case No. 142/2025. 7. This interlocutory application is, accordingly, allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant