SALEEM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/10294/2025 · 2025-12-10
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197301 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 197301 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10294 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.108 of 2025 under sections 191(2), 110, 115(2), 351(2), 352, 191(3), 105, 117(2) BNS, P.S. Malihabad, District Lucknow. 3. In terms of the FIR, allegations were levelled that on 10.05.2025, the accused named in the FIR, on account of an old enmity, armed with lathi, danda and sharp weapons came and started hurling abuses and started beating them because of which, the informant and the three other persons received grievous injuries. Subsequently, the brother of the informant died. 4. In the light of the said, the counsel for the applicant argues that a cross FIR was also registered at the instance of the applicant on account of the dispute that had taken place and the applicant's side had also suffered substantial injuries. The postmortem report on record indicates the cause of death as ante-mortem head injury. In the FIR, no specific allegations were levelled against any of the accused and general allegations were levelled against all the accused. No recovery was effected from the applicant. 5. Considering the fact that it was a case of cross FIR and general allegations Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manoj Kumar Gupta, Adesh Kumar, Akash Kumar Yadav, Ashish Chaurasia, Shubham Chaurasiya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Saleem .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
were levelled against as many as 13 persons without assigning any specific role to the applicant, as such, the applicant who is in custody since 06.06.2025 and has the criminal history of one case, which is a minor offence, the applicant is entitled for the bail. Thus the bail application is allowed. 6.
Let the applicant Saleem be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 10, 2025 VNP/- BAIL No. 10294 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench